Home | Writings | Resume | Links | RSS Feed
A Proud Member of the Reality-Based Community
Like the alignment of the planets, this blog gets updated as I have the time, inspiration, and inclination to do so.
Wednesday, June 09, 2004
The shortest and most straightforward statement of the problem comes from Verified Voting:
"Computerized voting equipment is inherently subject to programming error, equipment malfunction, and malicious tampering. It is therefore crucial that voting equipment provide a voter-verifiable audit trail, by which we mean a permanent record of each vote that can be checked for accuracy by the voter before the vote is submitted, and is difficult or impossible to alter after it has been checked. Many of the electronic voting machines being purchased do not satisfy this requirement. Voting machines should not be purchased or used unless they provide a voter-verifiable audit trail; when such machines are already in use, they should be replaced or modified to provide a voter-verifiable audit trail. Providing a voter-verifiable audit trail should be one of the essential requirements for certification of new voting systems."
-- Verified Voting Resolution (http://www.verifiedvoting.org/resolution.asp)
As a technical professional, I am in favor of applying computer technology to the administration of elections. I believe that the way it's being done by Diebold et al. is exactly the wrong way to do it, and it leaves us vulnerable to all kinds of mischief.